For years now, many households have enjoyed networks set up with older 802.11g/b Wi-Fi gear. Some even use aircards and 3G/4G wireless connections to cellular networks for their Internet access. Both of these options may run slower or less reliably than 802.11n. Do you feel compelled to upgrade your router or other wireless equipment to Wireless-N?Explain Why or Why Not
N no good on 2.4 Ghz, only 5 Ghz benefit
- Most people believe the hype speeds advertised on the boxes of routers. In a perfect world out in the middle of nowhere these speeds might be possible on 2.4 Ghz. But if you live in a crowded area with lots of other 2.4 Ghz routers or even other 2.4 Ghz devices, your chances of speed diminish greatly. In fact, most users probably experience little difference in speed from a older G mode router on 2.4Ghz. Now 5 Ghz is a different animal and, no doubt, if your hardware supports it the 5 Ghz band will ultimately do a lot better in wireless speed. But not necessarily in overall Internet speed. A faster local network does not guarantee a faster Internet. If you're on a fiber optics line, you may see improvement. But most people probably won't be so impressed, even if you say I have multiple devices so a faster router means all devices work better. That only really affects your local network. If many devices are accessing the Internet, you're going to end up dividing Internet speed anyway.
- —Guest Johnnythegeek
A fix is needed
- Wireless N is practically useless at this point. If you have a hidden SSID, there will be problems for a dual channel stream, if they are under the same name. Be warned if your devices only support 2.4GHz! N does nothing better than G on 2.4! If not worse - it will perform the same with less range.
- —Guest James
Interference may be an issue
- With an A or G network you should be getting at least 1.4MB/sec file copy speeds to a single wireless computer. If you aren't getting that, the problem is likely interference from all the neighborhood wireless devices. N supports speeds down to 1mbps instead of 6 which improves range. Antenna diversity may be able to combine separate signals to improve reception. Using two MIMO spatial streams can double the speed while only using one channel. N supports double width channels to double the speed yet again, but this creates more interference and makes it receive more interference.
- —Guest Retro User
Multiple users on one access point
- Access points work like hubs not switches. 10 users passing through an N (300Mb) router gives each user about 30 Mb. Also when both N and G devices work through the same access point, most access points drop to the G for all connections. My other observation is that people frequently change their router to the "N", but their computer or other wireless device is only cabable of "B" or "G". Both devices need to be upgraded.
Faster Wi-Fi with faster ADSL?
- I get the impression that from reading these posts that 'g' or 'n' max out well below the theoretical speeds. [Ed.: This is true.] My ADSL connection is 20 Mbps, and my ISP has just offered me 50Mbps or 100 Mbps for more money. Up until now, my Wifi devices which use 'g' and 'n' connect at 8 to 18 Mbps despite the 20 Mbps ADSL Ethernet line into the g+n router. I am wondering whether my measured speed on the Wifi devices will ncrease if I take up my ISP's offer for a faster connection? [Ed.: A: Yes, it is possible.]
N not needed - G is better
- First of all, you must understand what N is and what G is. We are talking about throughout of 54mbps and 300mbps. N uses dual channels and slices the data across them. Unless you have a really fast Internet pipe and do intense downloads/torrents then I'd go for N... else there's no point. G beats N and AC all the way. Yeah, I have 3 wireless N's and 4 Wireless G's and prefer wireless G's over N's.
- —Guest Hal
Consider the # of devices on network
- I never have a problem with a 802.11g network when I'm the only one using it. However, when my parents and sister begin to surf the web and stream HD videos I begin to experience extremely high ping. I usually play online games on my computer and this greatly ruins my experience. Consider switching if you have a lot of people sharing the same network wirelessly even if your ISP bandwidth is less than the actual 802.11g maximum.
- —Guest JimJitsu
N = NOT
- We were looking to boost our internet speeds, so we shopped for routers. The salesperson at Microcenter said our old wireless G was the problem, so he recommended the ASUS Wireless-N router, which we bought. Immediately our wireless speeds slowed to about half. Videos buffered like crazy: played a few secs, then stopped for nearly a minute. Games hung/stuttered. YouTube slow/audio out of sync. We run Linux (Mint 13), Win7 and Win8 systems. Did a fresh install of the Win8 & needed to download software: 24K/s! Yes, KILOBYTES. This is within 4ft of router, no obstructions. Dropbox install file of 32MB indicated 45mins-1 hr 12 mins to download. Even on Ethernet! Switched back to old Linksys G router - instant blazing fast speeds. No more video buffering, faster page loads, and the 32MB Dropbox install file downloaded in about 10 seconds. No competition here. The G is staying until we are forced to upgrade at some point in the future. The N is going back to Microcenter today.
- —Guest Karen
2.4 N not that great
- In my neighborhood 2.4 wireless rules. So much channel crowding that N speed channel bonding is not going to happen well. N should have never happened on 2.4 band. All of the 2.4 band routers are defaulting to single channel operation anyway due to good neighbor standards. I am basically getting G speeds anyway even if my connect speeds show higher. Its really averaging around 54 to 72 Mbps. At night even lower when stations are more active. Considering my broadband speed is 25mbps. Why do I need more then G speed anyway?
- —Guest john s
N is worse, for my needs.
- Many of the IP security cameras out there are G, not N, so if you buy an N router thinking that it will improve your security camera performance, think again. Many if not all of the Linksys N routers have a G mode that's actually slower than my WRT54GL wireless G router. I was far better off buying a powerline extender than a new router.
- —Guest khentiamentiu
N is the way to go
- Guys, just using the internet is not the only thing you could do with a router. You could stream movies, pictures across your devices at home like from a network hard disk to your Smart TV, or from your Phone to your TV or Phone to Laptop. To be able to support high bandwidth transfers you need a N Router. The G network would succumb to death... .
- —Guest Bobby
Only good if we had more channels
- Only upgraded to new router because my old D-Link "g" router doesn't support the newer PnP / SPI firewall standards. Went to a WD n900 for dual band support and bought an aftermarket Intel Centrino 6300 for my new laptop (which Dell was kind enough to have the required third antenna pre-installed) to get away from the 2.4 band because my neighbourhood was crowded with them. Only problem is I still need at least WEP encryption for DS games. But since this router was certified by the Wi-Fi alliance (although their WPS tech is insecure so I don't get why theyre still allowed to give input on an IEEE standard) I can't have both options speed vs. encryption. I don't get why they allow no encryption but "n" speeds as an option... because that's no worse then WEP.
- —Guest 8675309
Yes to N
- Went from 1 hour to DL a 10 meg file to 10 minutes for the same file from the same site. For me it worked out good. ...and its is even faster when working in Linux.
- —Guest Chofak
N is way better!
- For _me_ N has far better throughput reliability, speed, and distance. But it is a tad tricky to setup, you have to tinker with the router AND the CPUs. On a Bellkin (NP600) the best I got was 54mbps in N mode, a limit set by the mfg. Depending on where the client(s) were located, that dropped under 6mbps with intermittent disconnects. I swapped in a Linksys E4200 and saw immediate improvement to 148mbps, and better distance. I found my speed would only go to 148mbps on 2.4GHz, but 284mbps on 5GHz. 5GHz is supposed to give less distance, but my straight-line (through walls and multi-story (4-floors)) was OK, so I put b/g on 2.4GHz only and set N on 5GHz exclusive. Bingo! 284mbps, improved distance, and minimum speed to weakest location over 70mbps. N is rated to 300 so I tweaked some more. the final key was disabling IPv6 on the CPUs adapters, that gave me 300mbps. I don't need or use IPv6 so that's no loss, and great gain!
- —Guest FastFreddie
Better range - not
- Apparently not......I was told that it would increase the range from the router. My ancient D-Link transmitted as well if not better.
- —Guest Doug